""
Connect with us
"
"

Diaspora

There are three Harvard University graduates in the government of PM Maia Sandu

Published

on

Three of the cabinet members in Chisinau have master degrees at from Harvard University. These are the Minister of Finance, (Natalia Gavriliţă) Minister of Economy (Vadim Brânzan), and Prime Minister Maia Sandu.

Newsweek.ro made a comparison of the members of the Government of Chisinau with those of the Cabinet of Ministers in Bucharest.

Source: mei.gov.md

Vadim Brânzan, the new Minister of Economy in the Chisinau Executive, is a professor of physics, yet between 1999 and 2001 he took a Masters Degree in Finance at Harvard University. From 2001 to 2019, he worked for various investment companies in London, New York, and Miami, the latter being Miami’s Logos Advisers, specializing in “angel investments,” which is aimed at helping startups.

Source: privesc.eu

Maia Sandu assigned Natalia Gavriliţă as Minister of Finance. Natalia has a Masters degree at the John F. Kennedy School of Governance, Harvard University. From 2015 until today she was a director of a London investment fund. Gavriliță also worked at the European Commission and the World Bank. She worked in countries such as Bangladesh, Belgium, Ghana, India, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, the Kyrgyz Republic, Moldova, Nigeria, the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT), the Russian Federation, South Africa, Tajikistan, United Kingdom, USA, Zambia.

Moldova’s Minister of Agriculture is Georgeta Mincu, who holds a Master’s degree at the University of Dublin.

Source: Eastbook.eu

Nicu Popescu, the new Foreign Minister in Chisinau, is a Doctor of Political Sciences, a title obtained at the Central European University (CEU) in Budapest, with the thesis: “Stealth: EU and post-Soviet conflicts”. Popescu is a professor at the Po-Paris School of Science.

Image result for ministru georgeta mincu

Source: Gandul.info

Finally, the new Moldovan Prime Minister Maia Sandu has a Masters degree at the Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, and has worked at the World Bank in Washington DC.

Politics

The message of European and American officials for Moldova’s coalition government

Published

on

The representatives of the EU delegation in Moldova, the Embassy of Romania, UK, USA and of Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs have sent messages to the running coalition government of the Republic of Moldova in the context of latest developments related to the justice reform in the country. 

Both Prime Minister Maia Sandu and President Igor Dodon met with heads of diplomatic missions of different countries last week and discussed the crisis political situation created between the political bloc ACUM and the Party of Socialists of the Republic of Moldova (PSRM), which form the coalition government. At the same time, several diplomatic missions and state officials from all over the Europe and USA posted messages on social media, emphasising the need to establish a middle ground and overcome the tense political crisis.

The US Embassy in Moldova had the following message for Moldova’s coalition government:

“The United States supports the efforts of Prime Minister Sandu, President Dodon, and the governing coalition to overcome the current political impasse. Reforms critical to the Republic of Moldova’s democratic development have already been delayed for too long. As a friend of Moldova, we urge the country’s political leaders to quickly reach consensus on a solution that will preserve the path toward justice reform and allow the government to work to improve the lives of all Moldovans.”

The message of the Embassy of Romania in the Republic of Moldova:

“Romania supports the efforts of Prime Minister Maia Sandu and the ruling coalition to overcome the current political deadlock. The reforms are critical to the democratic development of the Republic of Moldova and the maintenance of its European path. As a strategic partner, Romania calls for political responsibility, underlining the need for the political leaders of the Republic of Moldova to quickly identify consensus on a solution that will ensure stability, keep the path to justice reform and allow the Government to improve the lives of all citizens.”

The British Embassy in the Republic of Moldova addressed to the political leaders of Moldova as following:

“As a friend of Moldova with a demonstrable and long-standing record of support for the reform process, the United Kingdom urges the country’s political leaders to reach consensus on a solution which preserves the path towards justice reform and allows the coalition government to continue to work for the benefit of all citizens of the Republic of Moldova. In June 2019, the United Kingdom welcomed the creation of the governing coalition which set a clear agenda of reforms critical to Moldova’s democratic development, including in the important area of judicial reform.”

The Deputy Foreign Minister of Poland Marcin Przydacz also called on reaching a consensus regarding the justice reform in Moldova.

 “Reforms in Moldova must continue. There is a need for consensus on important justice reforms by all stakeholders. We offer full support to these efforts.”

As you can see, consensus is the key word used in all messages addressed to the still existing coalition government.

On Friday, November 8th, PSRM brought a motion of censure in the Parliament against the current Government (ruled by ACUM) after the latter assumed responsibility for amending the Law on Prosecutor’s Office.

Prime Minister Maia Sandu stated that the Government will not withdraw its initiative on assuming responsibility for amending the Law on Prosecutor’s Office, as requested previously by the President of the Republic of Moldova, Igor Dodon.

Photo: gov.md

Continue Reading

Politics

PSRM brought a no-confidence motion in the Parliament criticising the Government. What’s next?

Published

on

Just a few hours ago, the Party of Socialists of the Republic of Moldova (PSRM) brought a no-confidence motion in the Parliament criticising the Government handling of the justice reform, namely the amendments to the Law on Prosecutor’s Office presented to legislature by the political bloc ACUM. 

The discussions in the Parliament

The socialists declared that the amendments proposed by ACUM endangers the independence of the prosecutor’s office and the independence of the justice.

“Maia Sandu ignored all good practices regarding the appointment of an independent prosecutor, ignored the constitution of the country and the opinion of the Venice Commission, preferring not to wait,” said the PSRM member Vasile Bolea.

On the other hand, Prime Minister Maia Sandu gave a speech in front of Members of the Parliament (MPs), in which she argued the position of ACUM regarding the amendment to the Law on Prosecutor’s Office, stating that this is the best solution for selecting an independent prosecutor general.

“We made some compromises. We did it to achieve the main objective – an independent prosecutor’s office, a fair justice. The fight for the prosecutor general is the red line.[…] Moldova has gone through several justice reforms. […] And yet the good intentions did not produce a result, being neutralised by hidden political interests. […] I decided to proceed differently. I assume the political responsibility for the process of identifying candidates for the position of prosecutor general. I will personally identify and verify honest, brave and well-intended people and propose them to the Superior Council of Prosecutors.

In this respect, I am encouraged by the position of the Venice Commission, expressed in other similar situations, according to which the selection of the prosecutor general must be done in such a way as to obtain the public’s confidence, and the selection of the prosecutor general with the involvement of the executive and legislative powers would offer more democratic legitimacy of this procedure.

Therefore, according to the Venice Commission, it is reasonable for a government to want to participate in the selection process of the prosecutor general on the grounds that the fight against corruption is crucial for the proper functioning of the state institutions,” stated Maia Sandu.

After that, the secretary of the PSRM faction, Vasile Bolea, submitted a no-confidence motion in the Parliament, expressing the withdrawal of the confidence granted to the Sandu Government.

The President’s declarations

President Igor Dodon still hopes that ACUM will withdraw the initiative, by which the Executive has assumed responsibility for amendments to the Law on the Prosecutor’s Office.

“There is still a few days for the unconstitutional initiative to be withdrawn. There is still room for reflections and understanding by ACUM that the prosecutor general cannot be politically subordinated, and the coalition should not be sacrificed on the altar of personal ambitions,” Igor Dodon wrote on Facebook after the Socialist faction submitted the no-confidence motion against the Government in the Parliament.

According to the Constitution of the Republic of Moldova, the prosecutor general is appointed by the President of the Republic of Moldova, at the proposal of the Superior Council of Prosecutors (SCP), for a term of 7 years, which cannot be renewed.

The amendments proposed by ACUM include selection by the prime minister, according to the approved procedure, of at least two candidates for the position of prosecutor general and submission of the list to the SCP. Next, the SCP would select one candidate from the list and would propose him/her to the president.

What’s next?

The Permanent Bureau of the Parliament will meet within the next three working days to decide when the next plenary session will be held, at which the no-confidence motion will be examined.

As following, the motion will be debated and voted. It is considered adopted with the vote of the majority of MPs (51). Thus, given that PSRM has 36 MPs, it must be voted by other factions as well. There is a great probability that the motion will be voted by the Democratic Party MPs and/or by Șor Party MPs.

In case the no-confidence motion is adopted,  the prime minister will submit to the President the resignation of the Government within a maximum of 3 days. If the no-confidence motion is rejected, the deputies who signed it will not be able to initiate, at the same session, a new motion for the same reason.

Protest in front of the Parliament

People have united in a protest to support the Sandu Government in front of the Parliament. They gathered and demanded a fair justice. The protesters came up with placards where it was written: “I support the Sandu Government”, “Checkmate – assumed prosecutor” “Independent prosecutor supported by the Parliament” and “It’s a must to have a fair prosecutor”.

source: TV8

source: TV8

Photo: privesc.eu

Continue Reading

Politics

Another dispute: ACUM and PSRM can’t share the responsibility for the justice reform

Published

on

From the results of the local elections in Moldova, which seemed a trigger of a crisis in the coalition government, the dispute between ACUM and PSRM moved to the subject of the justice reform in Moldova.

After the Party of Socialists of the Republic of Moldova (PSRM) expressed it’s concern regarding the “inefficiency of the Government and the increasingly negative perception citizens have about its activity”, as well as the intention to have discussions with ACUM about possible replacement of “inefficient” ministers, it seems that one more matter needs to be raised to eventual discussion between the coalition partners – the way the prosecutor general is appointed.

The cause of dispute

Everything began (or maybe it is better to say that it continued) when Minister of Justice Olesea Stamati announced at a press conference that she would issue an order for cancelling the result of the contest for the position of prosecutor general.

“As Minister of Justice, I cannot submit the list of selected candidates for the position of prosecutor general.”

According to Olesea Stamati, the reason why the contest wasn’t held according to legal requirements is the lack of sufficient information on candidates provided to the commission in charge with the evaluation of candidates, as well as the fact that Petru Bobu, one member of the commission, evaluated certain candidates in a clearly disproportionate manner. “This fact distorted the final result, influencing the contest,” highlighted Minister of Justice.

Petru Bobu rejected the accusations: “The suspicions are not well founded, I appraised candidates the way I found appropriate,” said Bobu for TV8.

The act of taking control

As a result of failed contest for selecting a new prosecutor general, the Government decided to assume the responsibility for amending the Law on Prosecutor’s Office, so that the prime minister would be responsible for pre-selecting the candidates.

As per changes made in the law in September 2019, the Ministry of Justice created a special commission for the pre-selection of a list of candidates, which subsequently had to be presented to the Superior Council of Prosecutors (SCP). This task could not be fulfilled because the members of the commission did not have access to sufficient data that would confirm the integrity and professionalism of the candidates.

The newly proposed amendments include selection by the prime minister, according to the approved procedure, of at least two candidates for the position of prosecutor general and submission of the list to the SCP. Next, the SCP would select one candidate from the list and would propose him/her to the president.

“Unfortunately, the process of evaluating the candidates for the position of prosecutor general was flawed.We went for an independent commission and pluralism of opinions. But ultimately, the responsibility for this process lies with us. We must assume the radical change we all need,” declared Prime Minister Maia Sandu at a press conference.

The socialists’ anger

The PSRM representatives declared against the ACUM initiative regarding the amendment of the Law on Prosecutor’s Office.  “This means that the future leader of the General Prosecutor’s Office would be appointed by the head of a political party, depending on his personal or political options. Such an initiative of the General Prosecutor’s Office political subordination is unacceptable in a country where intense efforts are being made to reform the justice system,” is written in the official statement of PSRM.

According to the statement, the initiative of Maia Sandu “flagrantly violates the agreement signed by ACUM and PSRM, where it was clearly mentioned that during the justice reform the selection of the prosecutor general will be carried out by contest, not by a politician.”

“This is certainly not the independence of justice promised by the current parliamentary majority. We can’t go back to the disastrous habits of the past, when a political leader decided who is running the General Prosecutor’s Office.”

The PSRM representatives also demanded the resignation of Minister of Justice Olesea Stamati, accusing her of incompetence.

The expert’s opinion

Political analyst Victor Ciobanu considers that the movement made by ACUM when cancelling the results of the pre-selection contest and taking responsibility for amendments of the Law on the Prosecutor’s Office is a “powerful move” in response to the last statements of disapproval of President Igor Dodon and PSRM regarding the activity of the Government.

“Cancelling the results of the contest is a good thing. Because to admit a mistake is much better than to insist on this mistake. Following the pressures made by the pubic, the contest score was published and it was clear that at least one representative delegated by PSRM tried to alter the results, which is inadmissible. Consequently, I think that was a good decision,” stated Victor Ciobanu.

The expert expressed his confidence that the coalition is not about to crumble until the eventual fall of the Government and snap elections, as none of the parts is interested in that. However, a compromise needs to be reached.

“ACUM should hand over certain ministries to Socialists for giving them the opportunity to be jointly responsible for the government. Otherwise, PSRM is in a very comfortable position to be in power and have no responsibility for the government activity, therefore being free to criticise it,” stated the expert.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Latest News

Politics1 day ago

The message of European and American officials for Moldova’s coalition government

The representatives of the EU delegation in Moldova, the Embassy of Romania, UK, USA and of Polish Ministry of Foreign...

Politics4 days ago

PSRM brought a no-confidence motion in the Parliament criticising the Government. What’s next?

Just a few hours ago, the Party of Socialists of the Republic of Moldova (PSRM) brought a no-confidence motion in...

Culture4 days ago

LEGATHON: Hack Corruption. Law to the People – an event for young people passionate about IT

The “LEGATHON: Hack Corruption. Law to the People” is an event which is organised for the first time in Moldova, being designed...

Politics5 days ago

Another dispute: ACUM and PSRM can’t share the responsibility for the justice reform

From the results of the local elections in Moldova, which seemed a trigger of a crisis in the coalition government,...

Opinion6 days ago

Could the PSRM-ACUM coalition government be hindered by the results of local elections in Chișinău?

The results of the second round of local elections have been already made public. In the capital city of Moldova,...

Important1 week ago

Moldova’s Press Council President: “Free mass media in Moldova still conducts its activity on subsistence level.”

Free mass media institutions in the Republic of Moldova are kept on subsistence level due to limited access to supposedly...

Politics1 week ago

Why young people from Moldova prefer not to vote? A case study on local elections held in Chișinău

Today, November 3rd, the second round of local elections in the Republic of Moldova are held. There are still 384...

Advertisement

Opinions

Advertisement

Trending