Politics
Moldova: ‘We Are Freer, Because We Have Nothing To Lose’
Reading Time: 4 minutesThe sudden outburst of public unrest that followed Moldovas recent parliamentary vote surprised many inside and outside the country. But not Oleg Brega, a journalist and filmmaker who says the upheaval was the natural outcome of years of political repression.
By Bernd Volkert
The sudden outburst of public unrest that followed Moldova’s recent parliamentary vote surprised many inside and outside the country. But not Oleg Brega, a journalist and filmmaker who says the upheaval was the natural outcome of years of political repression.
A founding member of the Moldovan public activism group Hyde Park, Brega has been opposing the government for many years. But after glimpsing a brief chance for change in the April protests following the country’s parliamentary elections, the 35-year-old now sees few opportunities left for activists like him.
"We don’t expect to see change in Moldova — because of this regime, [outgoing President Vladimir] Voronin, the Communist Party," Brega says. "After eight years of ruling, of governing, it started to behave as it is. It openly prohibits public assembly, it openly punishes people with opinions other than political ones, and now, after the fraudulent elections, they have started to prosecute even political parties, opposition parties."
Brega was involved in the postelection protests that rocked the country. He was beaten by police during the violence, and police subsequently searched his home and workplace, confiscating equipment and documents.
More than a month after the violence, the situation in Moldova remains quiet but tense.
The Communist Party of outgoing President Vladimir Voronin, who was confirmed this month as speaker of parliament, has retained its hold on an absolute parliamentary majority. Meanwhile, allegations of vote-rigging continue, as do claims that authorities abused protesters detained after the violence.
Public Discussion
Brega entered the world of political activism in 2001, the year when an earlier Communist victory sparked massive public protests. Brega began to host a nightly radio show — called Hyde Park, in honor of the site of the Speaker’s Corner in central London — and opened the airwaves to public debate with ordinary citizens about the state of the country. The Interior Ministry soon intervened, and the program was shut down.
Undaunted, Brega went on to found the Hyde Park activist group, aimed at promoting free expression, access to information, and human rights. But its attempts to hold demonstrations were frequently thwarted. Even in instances where the group successfully petitioned the courts for the right to stage a protest, police would break up the gathering and arrest participants.
Brega says it has been more than a year since Hyde Park attempted to organize a street protest, because of the fear of police persecution. "We are not very involved politically," he says.
Hyde Park even dissolved its status as a registered group in order to avoid pressure from the state. But Evgheni Golosceapov, the executive director of the Moldovan branch of Amnesty International, says that even such drastic measures have not brought an end to the authorities’ harassment.
"Usually [Hyde Park members] raise different kinds of issues which are not very comfortable for the government, or could be provocative to some extent for some groups within Moldovan society, and they try to express themselves — to promote freedom of speech, freedom of expression — in different, peaceful ways," Golosceapov says. "Many times they’ve faced different kinds of violations [against them] — for example, detentions during peaceful protests, or detentions during flash-mob actions."
While the activities of Hyde Park seem to be a significant nuisance for the government, Brega — who describes himself as a "free artist, a free journalist" — says his opposition activities will never extend to him joining the political arena.
Stay Or Go?
Brega, in fact, is critical of the Moldovan opposition, who failed to turn out in force during the April protests and who now are negotiating with the Communists for a small political role.
"Where was the opposition during those protests?" Brega asks. "So we’re criticizing them and we are going to remain in the opposition to any liberal, democratic, or even communist government."
The government, meanwhile, has begun to crack down on nongovernmental organizations and other groups it says were responsible for the April protests.
Several bodies have been targeted by the Justice Ministry with demands to explain their roles in the demonstrations and any steps they may have taken to stir or stop the violence. Voronin has blamed neighboring Romania for stirring the unrest; Brega, who says he favors a unification of Moldova and Romania, is likely to be among the activists inviting special scrutiny.
The increased scrutiny has not been limited to local organizations. Amnesty International’s Chisinau office was also subject to a visit by the tax police, who requested a copy of documents listing its members. Amnesty activists like Golosceapov say they are no longer able to work "free from harassment, obstruction, and intimidation."
"People do not feel comfortable in Moldova now," Golosceapov says. "People who felt the sense of freedom, of liberty — those for whom freedom of expression is very important — they are considering leaving the country. And this is not just one man, but many people."
‘Nothing To Lose’
The conditions are all too familiar to Brega. Asked if a new wave of protests is likely in the near future, Brega paints a bleak picture. Even if the public is stirred to mount fresh demonstrations, he says, it is not likely to shift the balance of power in Moldova away from the government.
"It’s almost sure to be the same scenario, because there are the same directors; the same police are acting on the streets," Brega says. "So I’m afraid every protest will have the same finish, the same results."
Asked about his future, Brega says he is likely to follow the thousands of Moldovans flowing out of the country in hopes of finding work — and freedom — as a filmmaker and journalist abroad.
The situation in Moldova, Brega says with resignation, is "long-lasting." But at times, his despair gives way to a kind of audacity regarding the state of Moldovan activism.
"We are freer because we have nothing to lose," Brega says. "We don’t have anything to lose. We are free now."
Featured
FC Sheriff Tiraspol victory: can national pride go hand in hand with political separatism?

A new football club has earned a leading place in the UEFA Champions League groups and starred in the headlines of worldwide football news yesterday. The Football Club Sheriff Tiraspol claimed a win with the score 2-1 against Real Madrid on the Santiago Bernabeu Stadium in Madrid. That made Sheriff Tiraspol the leader in Group D of the Champions League, including the football club in the groups of the most important European interclub competition for the first time ever.
International media outlets called it a miracle, a shock and a historic event, while strongly emphasizing the origin of the team and the existing political conflict between the two banks of the Dniester. “Football club from a pro-Russian separatist enclave in Moldova pulls off one of the greatest upsets in Champions League history,” claimed the news portals. “Sheriff crushed Real!” they said.
Moldovans made a big fuss out of it on social media, splitting into two groups: those who praised the team and the Republic of Moldova for making history and those who declared that the football club and their merits belong to Transnistria – a problematic breakaway region that claims to be a separate country.
Both groups are right and not right at the same time, as there is a bunch of ethical, political, social and practical matters that need to be considered.
Is it Moldova?
First of all, every Moldovan either from the right or left bank of Dniester (Transnistria) is free to identify himself with this achievement or not to do so, said Vitalie Spranceana, a sociologist, blogger, journalist and urban activist. According to him, boycotting the football club for being a separatist team is wrong.
At the same time, “it’s an illusion to think that territory matters when it comes to football clubs,” Spranceana claimed. “Big teams, the ones included in the Champions League, have long lost their connection both with the countries in which they operate, and with the cities in which they appeared and to which they linked their history. […] In the age of globalized commercial football, teams, including the so-called local ones, are nothing more than global traveling commercial circuses, incidentally linked to cities, but more closely linked to all sorts of dirty, semi-dirty and cleaner cash flows.”
What is more important in this case is the consistency, not so much of citizens, as of politicians from the government who have “no right to celebrate the success of separatism,” as they represent “the national interests, not the personal or collective pleasures of certain segments of the population,” believes the political expert Dionis Cenusa. The victory of FC Sheriff encourages Transnistrian separatism, which receives validation now, he also stated.
“I don’t know how it happens that the “proud Moldovans who chose democracy”, in their enthusiasm for Sheriff Tiraspol’s victory over Real Madrid, forget the need for total and unconditional withdrawal of Russian troops from Transnistria!” declared the journalist Vitalie Ciobanu.
Nowadays, FC Sheriff Tiraspol has no other choice than to represent Moldova internationally. For many years, the team used the Moldovan Football Federation in order to be able to participate in championships, including international ones. That is because the region remains unrecognised by the international community. However, the club’s victory is presented as that of Transnistria within the region, without any reference to the Republic of Moldova, its separatist character being applied in this case especially.
Is it a victory?
In fact, FC Sheriff Tiraspol joining the Champions League is a huge image breakthrough for the Transnistrian region, as the journalist Madalin Necsutu claimed. It is the success of the Tiraspol Club oligarchic patrons. From the practical point of view, FC Sheriff Tiraspol is a sports entity that serves its own interests and the interests of its owners, being dependent on the money invested by Tiraspol (but not only) oligarchs.
Here comes the real dilemma: the Transnistrian team, which is generously funded by money received from corruption schemes and money laundering, is waging an unequal fight with the rest of the Moldovan football clubs, the journalist also declared. The Tiraspol team is about to raise 15.6 million euro for reaching the Champions League groups and the amounts increase depending on their future performance. According to Necsutu, these money will go directly on the account of the club, not to the Moldovan Football Federation, creating an even bigger gab between FC Sheriff and other football clubs from Moldova who have much more modest financial possibilities.
“I do not see anything useful for Moldovan football, not a single Moldovan player is part of FC Sheriff Tiraspol. I do not see anything beneficial for the Moldovan Football Federation or any national team.”
Is it only about football?
FC Sheriff Tiraspol, with a total estimated value of 12.8 million euros, is controlled by Victor Gusan and Ilya Kazmala, being part of Sheriff Holding – a company that controls the trade of wholesale, retail food, fuels and medicine by having monopolies on these markets in Transnistria. The holding carries out car trading activities, but also operates in the field of construction and real estate. Gusan’s people also hold all of the main leadership offices in the breakaway region, from Parliament to the Prime Minister’s seat or the Presidency.
The football club is supported by a holding alleged of smuggling, corruption, money laundering and organised crime. Moldovan media outlets published investigations about the signals regarding the Sheriff’s holding involvement in the vote mobilization and remuneration of citizens on the left bank of the Dniester who participated in the snap parliamentary elections this summer and who were eager to vote for the pro-Russian socialist-communist bloc.
Considering the above, there is a great probability that the Republic of Moldova will still be represented by a football club that is not identified as being Moldovan, being funded from obscure money, growing in power and promoting the Transnistrian conflict in the future as well.
Photo: unknown
Politics
Prime Minister Natalia Gavrilita meets high-ranking EU officials in Brussels

Prime Minister of the Republic of Moldova, Natalia Gavrilita, together with Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs, Nicu Popescu, pay an official visit to Brussels, between September 27-28, being invited by High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Josep Borrell Fontelles.
Today, Prime Minister had a meeting with Charles Michel, President of the European Council. The Moldovan PM thanked the senior European official for the support of the institution in strengthening democratic processes, reforming the judiciary and state institutions, economic recovery and job creation, as well as increasing citizens’ welfare. Natalia Gavrilita expressed her confidence that the current visit laid the foundations for boosting relations between the Republic of Moldova and the European Union, so that, in the next period, it would be possible to advance high-level dialogues on security, justice and energy. Officials also exchanged views on priorities for the Eastern Partnership Summit, to be held in December.
“The EU is open to continue to support the Republic of Moldova and the ambitious reform agenda it proposes. Moldova is an important and priority partner for us,” said Charles Michel.
Prime Minister Natalia Gavrilita also met with Paolo Gentiloni, European Commissioner for Economy, expressing her gratitude for the support received through the OMNIBUS macro-financial assistance program. The two officials discussed the need to advance the recovery of money from bank fraud, to strengthen sustainable mechanisms for supporting small and medium-sized enterprises in Moldova, and to standardize the customs and taxes as one of the main conditions for deepening cooperation with the EU in this field.
Additionally, Prime Minister spoke about the importance of the Eastern Partnership and the Deep Free Trade Agreement, noting that the Government’s policies are aimed at developing an economic model aligned with the European economic model, focused on digitalization, energy efficiency and the green economy.
A common press release of the Moldovan Prime Minister with High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy/Vice-President of the Commission, Josep Borrell Fontelles, took place today, where the agenda of Moldova’s reforms and the main priorities to focus on in the coming months were presented: judiciary reform; fighting COVID-19 pandemic; promoting economic recovery and conditions for growth and job creation; strengthening state institutions and resilience of the country.
“I am here to relaunch the dialogue between my country and the European Union. Our partnership is strong, but I believe there is room for even deeper cooperation and stronger political, economic and sectoral ties. I am convinced that this partnership is the key to the prosperity of our country and I hope that we will continue to strengthen cooperation.”
The Moldovan delegation met Didier Reynders, European Commissioner for Justice. Tomorrow, there are scheduled common meetings with Oliver Varhelyi, European Commissioner for Neighborhood and Enlargement, Adina Valean, European Commissioner for Transport and Kadri Simson, European Commissioner for Energy.
Prime Minister will also attend a public event, along with Katarina Mathernova, Deputy Director-General for Neighbourhood Policy and Enlargement Negotiations.
Photo: gov.md
Politics
Promo-LEX about Maia Sandu’s UN speech: The president must insist on appointing a rapporteur to monitor the situation of human rights in Transnistria

The President of the Republic of Moldova, Maia Sandu, pays an official visit to New York, USA, between September 21-22. There, she participates in the work of the United Nations General Assembly. According to a press release of the President’s Office, the official will deliver a speech at the tribune of the United Nations.
In this context, the Promo-LEX Association suggested the president to request the appointment of a special rapporteur in order to monitor the situation of human rights in the Transnistrian region. According to Promo-LEX, the responsibility for human rights violations in the Transnistrian region arises as a result of the Russian Federation’s military, economic and political control over the Tiraspol regime.
“We consider it imperative to insist on the observance of the international commitments assumed by the Russian Federation regarding the withdrawal of the armed forces and ammunition from the territory of the country,” the representatives of Promo-LEX stated. They consider the speech before the UN an opportunity “to demand the observance of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights by the Russian Federation with reference to this territory which is in its full control.”
“It is important to remember about the numerous cases of murder, torture, ill-treatment, forced enlistment in illegal military structures, the application of pseudo-justice in the Transnistrian region, all carried out under the tacit agreement of the Russian Federation. These findings stem from dozens of rulings and decisions issued by the European Court of Human Rights, which found that Russia is responsible for human rights violations in the region.”
The association representatives expressed their hope that the president of the country would give priority to issues related to the human rights situation in the Transnistrian region and would call on relevant international actors to contribute to guaranteeing fundamental human rights and freedoms throughout Moldova.
They asked Maia Sandu to insist on the observance of the obligation to evacuate the ammunition and the military units of the Russian Federation from the territory of the Republic of Moldova, to publicly support the need for the Russian Federation to implement the ECtHR rulings on human rights violations in the Transnistrian region, and to request the appointment of an UN Human Rights Council special rapporteur to monitor the human rights situation in the Transnistrian region of the Republic of Moldova.
**
The Promo-LEX Association concluded that 14 out of 25 actions planned within the National Action Plan for the years 2018–2022 concerning respecting human rights in Transnistria were not carried out by the responsible authorities.
The association expressed its concern and mentioned that there are a large number of delays in the planned results. “There is a lack of communication and coordination between the designated institutions, which do not yet have a common vision of interaction for the implementation of the plan.”
Promo-LEX requested the Government of the Republic of Moldova to re-assess the reported activities and to take urgent measures, “which would exclude superficial implementation of future activities and increase the level of accountability of the authorities.”
Photo: peacekeeping.un.org