Politics
Moldova keeps out foreign journalists for third day in a row
Reading Time: 7 minutesOn April 10, it was the third day Moldovan authorities have refused to allow foreign journalists inside the country.
On April 10, it was the third day Moldovan authorities have refused to allow foreign journalists inside the country. Reporters seeking to cover events after the parliamentary elections tried to enter Moldova through the Romanian and the Ukrainian borders, to no avail. Customs authorities have claimed several reasons for refusing entry, like „technical” issues, the need for an invitation, accreditation, or medical insurance. Some were not given an explanation.
The media organizations whose employees were prevented from entering Moldova include the British Broadcasting Corporation, Radio Romania Actualitati [Imedia: Romanian for “News”], the Associated Press, EPA, France Press, Intact Images, NewsIn, Mediafax, Reuters, as well as Romanian newspapers Evenimentul Zilei, Jurnalul National, Ziua, and television station Realitatea TV.
At the same time, a large number of journalists from various media institutions were allowed to enter the country on April 8 after landing at the Chisinau airport from a Moscow flight. Several Moldovan journalists reporting on the ground have been intimidated and beaten by people who did not provide any identification.
Four reporters from Ziarul de Garda [Imedia: „The Guard Newspaper”] – a newspaper focused on investigation stories – were physically and verbally abused and threatened on the evening of April 8 by unknown individuals.
On the same day, at around 11 p.m., a cameraman from online television station JurnalTV was beaten by people in plain clothes. His two cameras were taken away, as well. Georgia asked for official explanations from Moldova for its refusal to allow journalists from various media outlets like Imedi, Rustavi-2, and others into the country. Russian news agency Itar-Tass says that Chisinau has been planning to deport three Romanian journalists, but it is unclear what media outlets they represent and if they have already been sent out of the country. No official press release has been made public about this topic. Romania-based Realitatea TV disappeared from cable services on April 7, during the violent protests that ended with the destruction of the Parliament and Presidential buildings. At the same time, there is information that online social networking sites like Facebook, Twitter, and Odnoklasniky cannot be accessed by Moldovans, especially by subscribers to internet services provided by state-run Moldtelecom.
Commentary:
Corina Cepoi: „This is not normal. If it were a war, certain limits to journalists’ access would be justifiable” Corina Cepoi, project director at the Independent Journalism Center (IJC), says that her organization will send an appeal letter to international human rights and journalist organizations and will ask them to „send protests to our state institutions – the Presidency, the Government, and the Parliament.” „They will be getting protests from every corner of the world. The New York-based Institute for the Protection of Journalists has already made a request. Romanian journalists have also done so via two organizations: the Press Monitorization Agency and the Investigative Journalism Center. People at the Ukrainian border also had problems getting in. As a result, we are talking about a general limitation of the freedom of expression and of the communication of information. Journalists are not allowed to get here to write about events in our country,” adds Corina Cepoi. Ms. Cepoi stresses that „this is not normal. If it were a war, certain limits to journalists’ access would be justifiable. In case of a war, journalists are embedded, placed next to military forces so that they are not attacked or fall victim to bombs, and so on. But we are talking here about demonstrations, so there is no reason to limit the access of journalists to this zone. They were asked for medical insurance, invitations, accreditation from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. But all of these things are not required. Women journalists from the Ziarul de Garda were beaten, pushed around, threatened with rape. This is very serious!”
Ioana Avadanii: „It is hard for us to believe that this is still possible in Europe in 2009” Ioana Avadanii, executive director of the Independent Journalism Center in Bucharest, says that „we still remember how foreign journalists were treated in 1989. For Romanians who lived during that time, this is a painful deja-vu. After 20 years of building democracy, it is hard for us to believe that this is still possible in Europe in 2009. But it is, which proves that the Voronin regime has something to hide.” Ms. Avadanei stresses that „what Chisinau authorities, which made this decision, seem not to have understood is that technology has changed, you can no longer shut down the country and not allow journalists to come in. You really cannot, information can no longer be controlled.”
Oleg Panfilov: „The Communist authorities in Moldova have begun to use the worst methods of authoritarian regimes” Oleg Panfilov, director of the Moscow-based Center for Journalism in Extreme Situations, believes that „we can talk about a certain political agreement, about the fact that Moldovan authorities have spoken with their Russian counterparts and have entirely changed their rhetoric. Whereas a few weeks ago Vladimir Voronin was talking about the fact that the actions of Moldovan authorities fall in line with Council of Europe legislation, now I believe that Chisinau officials have begun to act like the Kremlin, particularly toward foreign journalists.” “We previously thought that Moldova has always been a state that was more calm and harmless with regards to violating the rights of journalists, and it is true that, compared with other zones in the former Soviet Union, the situation was better… Now we see, however, that beyond all appearances, the Communist authorities in Moldova have begun to use the worst methods of authoritarian regimes, and will seemingly do everything to limit journalists’ access and to limit the spread of information about what is happening in Moldova,” argues Mr. Panfilov.
The Russian journalist is currently in Tbilisi (Georgia), where the opposition is staging largescale protests against President Mikheil Saakashvili. He suggested that „if Vladimir Voronin saw what is happening on Georgian television, he would have a heart attack because, for example, two television stations have been broadcasting these protests live, where people are demanding for the direct overthrow of the government or for the resignation of the Georgian president…” He concludes that “we could probably say that Vladimir Voronin has remembered his true origins, of a person who keeps his communist ideology in the background and by definition cannot have a different attitude toward the freedom of speech. His attitude toward journalists, toward mass media outlets that promote a different viewpoint fits absolutely with the regime that Vladimir Voronin represents.”
Gabriel Gatehouse: „I’ve never been refused entry into any country before. So this is a first for me. And it happened three times in a day” Gabriel Gatehouse, the BBC’s reporter for Ukraine, Belarus, and Moldova, says that he tried to enter the country on April 8 to cover the protests in downtown Chisinau, as well as the postelection situation. Mr. Gatehouse tried three ports of entry, but was refused each time, both by the Moldovan and the Transnistrian side. In Palanca, a customs point controlled by Moldova and Ukraine, several journalists, including Mr. Gatehouse, had to wait for approximately an hour before Moldovan authorities said “sorry, we are not letting you through.” “The official reason given at the Moldovan border crossing was that we did not have Moldovan Foreign Ministry accreditation. But we were given to understand that it was unusual to refuse entry to a foreign journalist for lacking accreditation. I was given to understand by the Foreign Ministry that the way it usually happens is – you come to Moldova, you go to the Foreign Ministry once you are there in Chisinau, and then you get your documents if you need them,” Mr. Gatehouse adds. The BBC journalist has had a long experience reporting the news, but “I’ve never been refused entry into any country before. So this is a first for me. And it happened three times in a day.” “Different countries,” he says “have different attitudes toward foreign journalists coming in and having an accreditation. In Ukraine if you come to work for a couple of weeks, there is absolutely no need to get an accreditation at all. In Russia it’s a very good idea to get an accreditation. But they certainly will let you into the country without that accreditation. You can get it once you get to Moscow. It’s very hard to get an accreditation in any other country, although not impossible. I’ve done it with Belarus. But this is the first time ever I have been denied entry to a country for being a journalist,” Mr. Gatehouse concludes.
File: Mass media organizations in Moldova (the Independent Journalism Center, the Association of Independent Press, the Center for Journalistic Investigation, the Acces-info Center, the Center for Young Journalists, and the Association of Electronic Press) have expressed their “concerns with the actions of Moldovan authorities, which limit the free movement of journalists, and calls on them to respect the obligations Moldova has pledged to respect by signing European treaties and conventions.”
At the same time, the media organizations “vehemently protest against police attacks on journalists doing their jobs and demand the immediate cessation of these abusive and illegal practices, the investigation of the mentioned cases, and the punishment of people who have committed abuses toward journalists.” The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ), which represents over 600,000 journalists in 123 countries, “condemns the decision by Moldova to bar Romanian journalists trying to cover disturbances in the country.” Aidan White, IFJ General Secretary, said that “the government cannot expect the international community to believe its claims if independent journalists are not allowed to do their work.” Other international media organizations have also released statements about the Moldovan authorities restricting journalistic activity and limiting the freedom of speech.
Profile: Corina Cepoi was born on December 5, 1971. She graduated from High School Nr. 1 in Chisinau and then went on to attend the Alexei Mateevici Teaching School. Ms. Cepoi holds a degree in English philology from the State University of Moldova and has two M.A.s – one from the State University of Moldova and the other from the University of Missouri-Columbia’s Journalism School in the United States. She interned for the Cape Cod Times and for the International Journalism Center in the U.S. Ms. Cepoi was also a Chevening researcher at Oxford University in the United Kingdom. She is a project director for Moldova’s School of Advanced Studies in Journalism and for the Independent Journalism Center (IJC). Between 2005 and 2008, Ms. Cepoi was interim head of the IJC. back
Ioana Avadanii is executive director of the Bucharest-based Center for Independent Journalism. She has an experience of over 15 years in the media field, having worked as a news agency and a television editor. She was instrumental in the passing of critical media legislation in Romania, such as the Access to Information Law. Between 2004 and 2006, Ms. Avadanii was president of the South East European Network for the Professionalization of the Media. back
Gabriel Gatehouse has been working for the BBC since 2001. He has been the Kiev correspondent for BBC News since January 2008, and he also covers the rest of Ukraine, Moldova, and Belarus. Mr. Gatehouse has previously worked on a variety of BBC radio programs and outlets, including the organization’s World Service, BBC 4 (domestic radio), and BBC Russian (for nearly five years). He was born on April 29, 1977. Mr. Gatehouse holds a degree from the University of London. He has also taken courses in Russia, and has developed a fondness for Russian literature. back
Oleg Panfilov has been head of the Moscow-based Center for Journalism in Extreme Situations since 2000. He has been a journalist since 1973, during which time he worked for the Associated Press, Nezavisimaia Gazeta (Russia) [Imedia: Russian for “Independent Newspaper”], Gazeta Wyborzca (Poland), and the Central Asia Magazine (Sweden). In 2000, Mr. Panfilov started producing and presenting a show entitled “The Government and the Press” on Radio Free Europe/Svoboda. He is one of the most well-known experts on security issues for journalists. Mr. Panfilov is also head of the Russian branch of the Committee for the Protection of Journalists (the United States). He has written and edited 27 books, numerous articles, and studies that have been published around the world. Mr. Panfilov was born in 1957 in Tajikistan. He has a personal blog and a website.
—-
Committee for Freedom of the Press
email: [email protected]
www.imedia.md
phone / fax: + 373 22 21 41 55
Featured
FC Sheriff Tiraspol victory: can national pride go hand in hand with political separatism?

A new football club has earned a leading place in the UEFA Champions League groups and starred in the headlines of worldwide football news yesterday. The Football Club Sheriff Tiraspol claimed a win with the score 2-1 against Real Madrid on the Santiago Bernabeu Stadium in Madrid. That made Sheriff Tiraspol the leader in Group D of the Champions League, including the football club in the groups of the most important European interclub competition for the first time ever.
International media outlets called it a miracle, a shock and a historic event, while strongly emphasizing the origin of the team and the existing political conflict between the two banks of the Dniester. “Football club from a pro-Russian separatist enclave in Moldova pulls off one of the greatest upsets in Champions League history,” claimed the news portals. “Sheriff crushed Real!” they said.
Moldovans made a big fuss out of it on social media, splitting into two groups: those who praised the team and the Republic of Moldova for making history and those who declared that the football club and their merits belong to Transnistria – a problematic breakaway region that claims to be a separate country.
Both groups are right and not right at the same time, as there is a bunch of ethical, political, social and practical matters that need to be considered.
Is it Moldova?
First of all, every Moldovan either from the right or left bank of Dniester (Transnistria) is free to identify himself with this achievement or not to do so, said Vitalie Spranceana, a sociologist, blogger, journalist and urban activist. According to him, boycotting the football club for being a separatist team is wrong.
At the same time, “it’s an illusion to think that territory matters when it comes to football clubs,” Spranceana claimed. “Big teams, the ones included in the Champions League, have long lost their connection both with the countries in which they operate, and with the cities in which they appeared and to which they linked their history. […] In the age of globalized commercial football, teams, including the so-called local ones, are nothing more than global traveling commercial circuses, incidentally linked to cities, but more closely linked to all sorts of dirty, semi-dirty and cleaner cash flows.”
What is more important in this case is the consistency, not so much of citizens, as of politicians from the government who have “no right to celebrate the success of separatism,” as they represent “the national interests, not the personal or collective pleasures of certain segments of the population,” believes the political expert Dionis Cenusa. The victory of FC Sheriff encourages Transnistrian separatism, which receives validation now, he also stated.
“I don’t know how it happens that the “proud Moldovans who chose democracy”, in their enthusiasm for Sheriff Tiraspol’s victory over Real Madrid, forget the need for total and unconditional withdrawal of Russian troops from Transnistria!” declared the journalist Vitalie Ciobanu.
Nowadays, FC Sheriff Tiraspol has no other choice than to represent Moldova internationally. For many years, the team used the Moldovan Football Federation in order to be able to participate in championships, including international ones. That is because the region remains unrecognised by the international community. However, the club’s victory is presented as that of Transnistria within the region, without any reference to the Republic of Moldova, its separatist character being applied in this case especially.
Is it a victory?
In fact, FC Sheriff Tiraspol joining the Champions League is a huge image breakthrough for the Transnistrian region, as the journalist Madalin Necsutu claimed. It is the success of the Tiraspol Club oligarchic patrons. From the practical point of view, FC Sheriff Tiraspol is a sports entity that serves its own interests and the interests of its owners, being dependent on the money invested by Tiraspol (but not only) oligarchs.
Here comes the real dilemma: the Transnistrian team, which is generously funded by money received from corruption schemes and money laundering, is waging an unequal fight with the rest of the Moldovan football clubs, the journalist also declared. The Tiraspol team is about to raise 15.6 million euro for reaching the Champions League groups and the amounts increase depending on their future performance. According to Necsutu, these money will go directly on the account of the club, not to the Moldovan Football Federation, creating an even bigger gab between FC Sheriff and other football clubs from Moldova who have much more modest financial possibilities.
“I do not see anything useful for Moldovan football, not a single Moldovan player is part of FC Sheriff Tiraspol. I do not see anything beneficial for the Moldovan Football Federation or any national team.”
Is it only about football?
FC Sheriff Tiraspol, with a total estimated value of 12.8 million euros, is controlled by Victor Gusan and Ilya Kazmala, being part of Sheriff Holding – a company that controls the trade of wholesale, retail food, fuels and medicine by having monopolies on these markets in Transnistria. The holding carries out car trading activities, but also operates in the field of construction and real estate. Gusan’s people also hold all of the main leadership offices in the breakaway region, from Parliament to the Prime Minister’s seat or the Presidency.
The football club is supported by a holding alleged of smuggling, corruption, money laundering and organised crime. Moldovan media outlets published investigations about the signals regarding the Sheriff’s holding involvement in the vote mobilization and remuneration of citizens on the left bank of the Dniester who participated in the snap parliamentary elections this summer and who were eager to vote for the pro-Russian socialist-communist bloc.
Considering the above, there is a great probability that the Republic of Moldova will still be represented by a football club that is not identified as being Moldovan, being funded from obscure money, growing in power and promoting the Transnistrian conflict in the future as well.
Photo: unknown
Politics
Prime Minister Natalia Gavrilita meets high-ranking EU officials in Brussels

Prime Minister of the Republic of Moldova, Natalia Gavrilita, together with Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs, Nicu Popescu, pay an official visit to Brussels, between September 27-28, being invited by High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Josep Borrell Fontelles.
Today, Prime Minister had a meeting with Charles Michel, President of the European Council. The Moldovan PM thanked the senior European official for the support of the institution in strengthening democratic processes, reforming the judiciary and state institutions, economic recovery and job creation, as well as increasing citizens’ welfare. Natalia Gavrilita expressed her confidence that the current visit laid the foundations for boosting relations between the Republic of Moldova and the European Union, so that, in the next period, it would be possible to advance high-level dialogues on security, justice and energy. Officials also exchanged views on priorities for the Eastern Partnership Summit, to be held in December.
“The EU is open to continue to support the Republic of Moldova and the ambitious reform agenda it proposes. Moldova is an important and priority partner for us,” said Charles Michel.
Prime Minister Natalia Gavrilita also met with Paolo Gentiloni, European Commissioner for Economy, expressing her gratitude for the support received through the OMNIBUS macro-financial assistance program. The two officials discussed the need to advance the recovery of money from bank fraud, to strengthen sustainable mechanisms for supporting small and medium-sized enterprises in Moldova, and to standardize the customs and taxes as one of the main conditions for deepening cooperation with the EU in this field.
Additionally, Prime Minister spoke about the importance of the Eastern Partnership and the Deep Free Trade Agreement, noting that the Government’s policies are aimed at developing an economic model aligned with the European economic model, focused on digitalization, energy efficiency and the green economy.
A common press release of the Moldovan Prime Minister with High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy/Vice-President of the Commission, Josep Borrell Fontelles, took place today, where the agenda of Moldova’s reforms and the main priorities to focus on in the coming months were presented: judiciary reform; fighting COVID-19 pandemic; promoting economic recovery and conditions for growth and job creation; strengthening state institutions and resilience of the country.
“I am here to relaunch the dialogue between my country and the European Union. Our partnership is strong, but I believe there is room for even deeper cooperation and stronger political, economic and sectoral ties. I am convinced that this partnership is the key to the prosperity of our country and I hope that we will continue to strengthen cooperation.”
The Moldovan delegation met Didier Reynders, European Commissioner for Justice. Tomorrow, there are scheduled common meetings with Oliver Varhelyi, European Commissioner for Neighborhood and Enlargement, Adina Valean, European Commissioner for Transport and Kadri Simson, European Commissioner for Energy.
Prime Minister will also attend a public event, along with Katarina Mathernova, Deputy Director-General for Neighbourhood Policy and Enlargement Negotiations.
Photo: gov.md
Politics
Promo-LEX about Maia Sandu’s UN speech: The president must insist on appointing a rapporteur to monitor the situation of human rights in Transnistria

The President of the Republic of Moldova, Maia Sandu, pays an official visit to New York, USA, between September 21-22. There, she participates in the work of the United Nations General Assembly. According to a press release of the President’s Office, the official will deliver a speech at the tribune of the United Nations.
In this context, the Promo-LEX Association suggested the president to request the appointment of a special rapporteur in order to monitor the situation of human rights in the Transnistrian region. According to Promo-LEX, the responsibility for human rights violations in the Transnistrian region arises as a result of the Russian Federation’s military, economic and political control over the Tiraspol regime.
“We consider it imperative to insist on the observance of the international commitments assumed by the Russian Federation regarding the withdrawal of the armed forces and ammunition from the territory of the country,” the representatives of Promo-LEX stated. They consider the speech before the UN an opportunity “to demand the observance of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights by the Russian Federation with reference to this territory which is in its full control.”
“It is important to remember about the numerous cases of murder, torture, ill-treatment, forced enlistment in illegal military structures, the application of pseudo-justice in the Transnistrian region, all carried out under the tacit agreement of the Russian Federation. These findings stem from dozens of rulings and decisions issued by the European Court of Human Rights, which found that Russia is responsible for human rights violations in the region.”
The association representatives expressed their hope that the president of the country would give priority to issues related to the human rights situation in the Transnistrian region and would call on relevant international actors to contribute to guaranteeing fundamental human rights and freedoms throughout Moldova.
They asked Maia Sandu to insist on the observance of the obligation to evacuate the ammunition and the military units of the Russian Federation from the territory of the Republic of Moldova, to publicly support the need for the Russian Federation to implement the ECtHR rulings on human rights violations in the Transnistrian region, and to request the appointment of an UN Human Rights Council special rapporteur to monitor the human rights situation in the Transnistrian region of the Republic of Moldova.
**
The Promo-LEX Association concluded that 14 out of 25 actions planned within the National Action Plan for the years 2018–2022 concerning respecting human rights in Transnistria were not carried out by the responsible authorities.
The association expressed its concern and mentioned that there are a large number of delays in the planned results. “There is a lack of communication and coordination between the designated institutions, which do not yet have a common vision of interaction for the implementation of the plan.”
Promo-LEX requested the Government of the Republic of Moldova to re-assess the reported activities and to take urgent measures, “which would exclude superficial implementation of future activities and increase the level of accountability of the authorities.”
Photo: peacekeeping.un.org